Media takes on right to reply


BAGUIO CITY — The distance to Manila is not a barrier for journalists here to join their national counterpart on the snowballing opposition to the Right of Reply Bill

Believed by media practitioners as a measure that would abridge the freedoms of the press and of expression, the Right of Reply Bill is the subject of a media forum next week.

As their concrete contribution to discuss the substance of the bill and its effect on the profession, media practitioners, including publishers and editors, will participate in a round table discussion on the issue on Saturday, March 7, at 2:00 to 5:00 P.M. at the People’s Multi-Purpose Hall at the Baguio City Hall.

The speakers include Sonny Fernandez, national secretary-general of the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP), a prime mover of the move to oppose the said bill. Panel of reactors from the editors, publishers and practitioners will also share their ideas on the Right of Reply Bill.

Senate Bill No. 2150 and House Bill No. 3306 are entitled, “An act granting the right of reply and providing penalties for violation thereof.”The Senate version was already passed in third reading while the House version is allegedly being fast tracked by members of the said body.

Right of Reply is defined by both bills as “All persons natural or juridical who are accused directly or indirectly of committing or having committed or of intending to commit any crime or offense defined by law or are criticized by innuendo, suggestion or rumor for any lapse in behavior in public or private life shall have the right to reply to the charges published or printed in newspapers, magazines, newsletters or publications circulated commercially or for free, or to criticisms aired or broadcast over radio, television, websites, or through any electronic device.”

A statement of unity signed by various media practitioners from the national and local levels still gains signatures via the internet as more claims that the bill was adopted without prior consultations from the stakeholders.

Desiree Caluza, secretary-general of the NUJP Baguio-Benguet, said the bill should be opposed because it clearly violates the objectives of journalism and press freedom in general.

It disrespects the freedom, intelligence and enterprise of news people to deliver quality news stories,” added Caluza, who is also a member of the NUJP national directorate, the highest policy making body in between the general assembly done every two years. She added “Only trapos” (or traditional politicians) who do not know the spirit of press freedom, fought for by the people in EDSA 1, will benefit from this bill.”

Another NUJP Baguio – Benguet officer Rimaliza Opina added the bill should be opposed because the proposed law would delegate editorial job to the government . The journalism code of ethics should be strictly implemented by media outfits instead,” Opina ended.

The authors of the Senate Bill are Senators Aquilino Q. Nene Pimentel, Ramon Revilla, Jr., and Francis Escudero while the authors of the House version are Representatives Angara, Puentevella, Fua, Abante, Lapus, Tieng and Zialcita. # Northern Dispatch

2 Responses to “Media takes on right to reply”

  1. Renato Pacifico Says:

    BBC has right-to-reply. Florida has right to reply. Civilized world has right-to-reply. PHILIPPINES DON’T NEED THE RIGHT TO REPLY!!!

    There are plenty of gung-gong news article and column that needs right-to-reply.

    Right-to-reply is education to gung-gong media practitioners. Only thing is media practitioners are so OBLIVIOUS THEY DON’T KNOW THEY ARE DUMB!

    IF MY POST GETS DELETED IT’S BECAUSE YOU DON’T WANT TO FACE THE TRUTH!
    ===
    Renato Pacifico,

    What truth?

    That you accuse me of not facing your truth if i “deleted” your post? Hmmm… Why the arrogance?

    We already have the right to reply in the philippines. we always have this letter to the editor section. holding your own presscon where you can air your reply is another form of your right to reply. and even filing a libel case against your “gung-gong” media practitioners, is a form of reply.

    You see, we are not against the right to reply, the real right to reply, because its part of our freedom of speech. What we are against of is the legislated abuse of it.

    Barangay RP

  2. emie padlan Says:

    isa ako s mga mamayan ng taguig western bicutan,ang comment k lng ho bakit tuwing barangay at sk election s aming lugar ang dayaan ay laganap ganon nman n meron comelec at ppcrv kung cno p ho ang dapat mag ayus ng election s aming barangay,cla p ho itong nag simula ng dayaan halimbawa po ng guro at ppcrv cla ang mga tauhan ng dating major n c freddie tinga,harapan p s mga maraming tao ang ginagawa nlng pang daraya s oras ng barangay election ang gusto lng ng mamayan ng taguig s western bicutan,ay maging maayus at malinis ngayon darating election humingi kami ng tulong s mga nkakataas s comelec o kay president aquino n batayan mabuti ang election ngayon ng barangay sana po mabigyaan ng katarungan ang boto ng mga tao s western bicutan taguig kung cno ang gusto nla maging kapitan barangay ngayon plng ho nag papasalamat n kaming mga taga western bicutan taguig s inyong tulong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: